发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

日本车优势已经不复存在: [复制链接]

查看: 4511|回复: 35
1#
The Chrysler--Hyundai World Engine: 1.8, 2.0, 2.4:

CHRYSLER的这款发动机效率已经超越竞争对手,HONDA,TOYOTA,NISSAN:

Engine HP Lb-Ft Nm
1.8 liter 140 125 169
2.0 liter 150 140 190
2.4 liter 170 165 224
2.4 turbocharged 235? ? ?


The first of the "world engines" in the United States with key advanced technologies - variable valve timing and a flow-control valve intake manifold - will be sold by Chrysler. The engines were designed jointly by Chrysler, Mitsubishi, and Hyundai, and will be made and used by all three - in rather different configurations. For example, Chrysler is using its own home-grown dual-variable-valve technology to control both intake and exhaust valves; Hyundai is not using that system, though it may be working on its own. The result of this, as well as different intakes and other packaging details, will probably result in rather different power outputs for each of the three companies using the same basic engines.


The engines made by Chrysler will be in three displacements, all familiar to Chrysler owners (because all three are similar to the current Neon/Stratus engine): 1.8, 2.0, and 2.4 liters. The 2.4 should reach 170 horsepower and 165 lb-ft of torque, which is roughly 20 hp better than the current 2.4. At the same time, they will reach ULEV II emissions standards and increase gas mileage by 5% over the current line. Some of the gain is due to variable valve timing, with continuously variable phasing of both the intake and exhaust valves ("dual VVT"). Though Chrysler has been late to the variable valve party, it will be the first company to offer dual VVT in the United States on entry-level vehicles - using a Mercedes system. The heads are wedge-shaped.

The engines are designed to be turbocharged and supercharged, partly through over-engineering of the block, and use of large water jackets and metal areas around each siamesed cylinder.



Noise, vibration, and harshness are addressed through an isolated valve cover and damped oil pan, a variety of select-fit parts, and the flow control valve ("variable") intake manifold.  The bell housing is designed for a tighter than usual connection to the transmission, hopefully eliminating the oil leaks that often come to high-mileage engines.



The engine has a high-pressure, die-cast aluminum block and will be built in a new joint-venture plant in Dundee, Michigan; blocks for the Dundee engines are made by J.L. French of Wisconsin. The engines built in Dundee will most likely be used entirely in Chrysler vehicles at first, though we'd expect Mitsubishi to use the same engines for their American-made Eclipse and Galant. We have no word on the fate of the plant that makes the current 2.0, 2.4, and 1.8.
    

The photos are courtesy of Chrysler. We expect many more details - stay tuned to this page!

Who is actually designing the engines?Reportedly, the basic block was designed by Hyundai, and Chrysler and Mitsubishi then made a large number of modifications to make it more efficient and adapt it to their uses and technologies. Most of the packaging/dressing components, such as intake manifolds and valve timing equipment, appear to have been developed by each partner independently and will be used independently as well. For example, the variable valve timing was developed by Mercedes and is used on the V6 in the E-Class. J.L. French makes the blocks for American engines, with Nemak providing head castings from Mexico.

While some have said that Chrylser paid $57 million in royalties to Hyundai for design work, an informed source noted that the funding for GEMA was put togther by all the partners, and that $57 million was just DCX's share of the GEMA funding. GEMA itself is a separate company from DCX, MMC, and Hyundai, and it pays royalties to external and internal partners and patent holders.

Clever stuffThe plastic intake manifold has equal-length runners with electrical flow control valves that, when closed, increase air tumble by blocking over half the intake port. Over 3,200 rpm, the valves are opened to allow full airflow. The valve cover is also composite (plastic) and has a variety of vibration-reducing seals.

The electro-hydraulic dual valve timing system uses oil under pressure to adjust timing (both intake and exhaust) using cam phasing so that timing is continuously variable. There is little overlap at idle and more overlap at speed, to permit built-in exhaust gas reburning without a pump. The exhaust cam can move through 35 degrees; the intake through 40 degrees. The cams ride on tappets that come in four dozen very similar thicknesses; the tappets are automatically matched to the individual heads during assembly, eliminating the need to adjust valve lash.

While all the engines use essentially the same block, displacement is changed by shortening the stroke or using thicker piston liners. The pistons themselves have short skirts and friction-reducing graphite patches. The crankshaft is forged steel, is located above the balance shaft/oil pump, and draws oil from the oil pan; it includes an integrated pump. The blocks are all automatically measured at the factory and key components such as pistons and bearings are matched to individual engines to reduce machining and noise, while increasing engine efficiency.

Why are they designing and building engines with two competitors?Total World Engine production, from two plants in Dundee, two in South Korea, and one in Japan, is expected to be 1.8 million engines per year. Each participating company will see far higher volumes, offsetting engineering costs (by amortizing them over more units) and allowing cost savings from parts purchasing as well. Many components, including pistons, valves, rods, fuel injectors, and camshafts, are outsourced; by raising the volume, the Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance (GEMA) can reduce the price of these as vendors are also able to amortize engineering costs over higher volumes. The result will, according to GEMA, save $100 million per year for DCX. There are also price savings from having similarly designed assembly plants, albeit in different countries.

Capital investment has further been reduced by standardizing machining centers, using commonly available machines, and by running the plant in the US 294 days per year.

According to GEMA, Chrysler actually took the lead in development of the dual variable valve timing system.

"Flexible machining centers in a hospital-clean manufacturing environment are the basis to the GEMA business model," said GEMA President Coventry. "Compared to the traditional transfer line process, this model incorporates part recognition and automatic changeover features to allow different products to flow down the line seamlessly; even allowing for a batch size of one. An even greater benefit that machining centers give us over transfer lines is uninterrupted flow, even if there is machine downtime. In the end, we're creating a final product with higher precision, better performance and durability that greatly exceeds each partner company's previous standards."

The Chrysler Group will take the lead in operating the two Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance facilities in Dundee, Mich. GEMA is investing more than $700 million in the 1 million square-foot plant, which will create approximately 550 jobs in Southeast Michigan. Each of the two Dundee plants will have capacity of 420,000 units per year.
最后编辑Enki
分享 转发
TOP
2#

[upload=jpg]Upload/20055244564037078.jpg[/upload][upload=jpg]Upload/20055244592389676.jpg[/upload]
TOP
3#

300C 在欧洲售价5万多欧元.欧洲人和中国人一样价格!.
TOP
4#

300C 优异的性能: MDS可变排量系统的动画片,不需要时(如高速巡航)以四缸工作:

http://www.chrysler.com/300/features/performance/index.html
TOP
5#

可以看出来,发动机极其先进,对比日本鬼的偷工减料,这发动机采用模块式设计,及1.8,2.0,2.4的区别仅仅在与内部缸套的厚薄不同(内径不同),从土可以看出来,缸体极其厚实.因为设计时就考虑到将来要加SUPER CHARGER,机械增压和TURBO涡轮增压,指令水面积和流量够考虑TURBO要求而做得很大,所以不用的TURBO的自然进气工作时候,这发动机是OVERENIGINED,设计强度远远超过使用要求.
TOP
6#

买这档次车还怕油耗>? 另外,什么美国车油耗高纯属胡扯.
自己有点脑子,车重和动力系统效率决定油耗. 如果美日车重量相同,油耗日本车没有什么优势.
TOP
7#

美国车也不都是悬挂软,别把个鳖壳等同于到所有美国车. 中国路况其实与美国相同,城市都在大平原上. 你说那些saab 9-5, opel omega, peueot 406, 甚至国产audi a6也不错. 根本跟300C不是一个档次. 中国的300C是美国出口 的欧洲版,调矫更欧化,300C本来悬挂就比较硬,欧版就更硬了,转向感也重.
TOP
8#

3.5L V6 250马力的300C 才45多万!据说明年将换4.0L V6 300马力
TOP
9#

Chrysler’s 5.7L Hemi V-8 is fast becoming an American icon.


Print-friendly format  E-mail this information





Chrysler Group’s “original” 5.7L Hemi Magnum OHV V-8 launched for the’03 model year with 345 hp in the Ram pickup. For the ’04 model year, Ford Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. both launched all-new pickups, each crucial to the respective auto makers’ place in one of the U.S.’s most competitive segments.

Yet Ford and Nissan couldn’t drum up enough power with their best V-8s to even get close to the mighty Hemi – in a high-profile, high-profit segment whose buyers worship the horsepower number.

Now Chrysler’s at it again, this time flaunting its long-range planning acumen by designing the ground-breaking 300-Series sedan (and to a lesser extent, the husky Magnum station wagon on the same platform) to accept the Hemi.


Chrysler 5.7L Hemi V-8 improved for ’05 with MDS cylinder-deactivation system.
The combination is a smash hit, both playing on the other’s strengths: The 300C hit the market with immediate, hip-hop “street cred” and features the Hemi. The Hemi’s the one engine everybody wants, meanwhile, and you can get one in a 300C. Thanks in no small part to the Hemi, the 300C overshadowed virtually every other new vehicle launched in 2004. The 300C would have been cool without the Hemi. But with the Hemi, it’s a let’s-find-another-assembly-plant home run.

The 300C/Magnum application has helped stoke the Hemi fires in the face of escalating fuel prices and a growing “green” movement in the car business. In every model that offers the Hemi – an expanding list that also includes the all-new Jeep Grand Cherokee – Chrysler’s getting customers to pay extra for an unabashedly in-your-face V-8 that sucks the earth’s resources at a rate that’s egregious even by American V-8 standards. The company says the overall take rate is a giddy 46%.

Earning a spot on the Ward’s 10 Best Engines list for a third consecutive year, the Hemi is a juggernaut, seemingly better in each new application, particularly now that the 300C/Magnum and the Grand Cherokee have the cylinder-deactivating Multi-Displacement System to improve fuel economy by “up to 20%.”

The 300-Series cars would have been slapped with a gas-guzzler tax without MDS, incidentally, so spectacular is the Hemi’s thirst. So Hemi “father” and chief engineer Robert Lee – now Chrysler vice president-powertrain product team – seems particularly prescient, as his team designed the Hemi from the beginning to accommodate MDS. The system works beautifully and imperceptibly.

Ward’s 10 Best Engines judges had universal kudos for the Hemi’s 340-hp in the 300C, but more impressive is the 390 lb.-ft. (529-Nm) torque peak, a full 15 lb.-ft. (20 Nm) more even than in the Ram pickup. Rarely will you hear automotive journalists say any vehicle has enough power. The 300C has enough power.

This spring, though, the Hemi gets bigger and badder, with a 6.1L, 425-hp variant waiting for launch in the high-performance SRT8 version of the 300C. Do we need to tell you what to expect


Hemi Magnum 5.7L OHV V-8
Engine type 5.7L OHV 90° V-8
Displacement (cc) 5,654
Block/head material iron/aluminum
Bore x stroke (mm) 99.5 x 90.9
Horsepower (SAE net) 340 @ 5,000 rpm
Torque 390 lb.-ft. (529 Nm) @ 4,000 rpm
Specific output 60 hp/L
Compression ratio 9.6:1
Application tested Chrysler 300C (RWD)
Fuel economy for tested vehicle (EPA city/highway mpg) 17/25
最后编辑Enki
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题